K-SNAPP

"Did I delete all the KakaoTalks?" — 'Injection Auntie' Hints at Jun Hyun-moo in Cryptic Post, Stirring Major Controversy

'Injection Auntie' drops Jun Hyun-moo’s name and teases more exposés

Injection Auntie, Jun Hyun-moo, illegal, procedure, exposé, allegations
Photo: A’s Instagram, MBC

The so-called "Injection Auntie" A, who faces allegations over illegal medical procedures, has ignited a fresh wave of controversy after posting a cryptic message on social media that many believe alludes to announcer-turned-TV personality Jun Hyun-moo.

Recently, A uploaded a screenshot of part of a messenger chat to her social media. Alongside the image, she wrote, "Faith can sometimes save a person, but faith given to just anyone eventually comes back as hurt and responsibility," insisting that the outcomes of her relationships and choices would reveal themselves over time.

The post especially drew attention because the shared chat included a line mentioning the name "Hyun-moo hyung." A then added, "When the scandal broke, you told me to delete all our KakaoTalks. Do you think I really deleted everything?"—hinting there could be more to reveal. Although parts of the image were redacted, speculation quickly spread that the target might be Jun Hyun-moo.

A had previously uploaded posts a few months ago that reminded the public of Jun Hyun-moo. While she offered no direct explanations at the time, she fueled controversy by implying certain broadcast images and names. With this new chat screenshot, public attention has zeroed in once again.

A is currently under investigation on suspicion of providing illegal medical services to some celebrities. The fallout has grown as names such as comedian Park Na-rae, SHINee member Key, and mukbang influencer Haetnim (Short-Mouthed Haetnim) surfaced; some parties have said they believed the person in question was a medical professional.

Meanwhile, Jun Hyun-moo’s side has firmly distanced itself from the claims. His agency stated officially, "We have nothing to do with illegal procedures or unlicensed medical acts," and presented records of treatment and payment from accredited medical institutions to deny the allegations.

However, public fatigue is mounting as A repeatedly posts suggestive messages for months without presenting concrete evidence. With names being directly mentioned or implied despite facts remaining unverified, online reactions are a mix of concern and exhaustion.

The latest post also stops short of a direct exposé, functioning more as a teaser for additional claims. As the investigation continues, it remains to be seen whether A’s recurring social media hints will lead to actual evidence—or simply trigger yet another round of controversy.